[SLL] collaborate on a dnsbl?

[Jules Agee]

Glenn Stone wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:01:48AM -0700, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> 
>>On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:18 am, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>>
>>>I continue to get virus and spams sent to my systems that aren't listed on
>>>the RBLs that I use. I also sometimes check a set of other RBLs and not
>>>listed.
>>
>>Have you tried using spamassassin, razor2, pyzor and using selected rules
> 
>>from SARE?
> 
> SARE?  Was ist das?

Spam Assassin Rules Emporium. Some very nice third-party addon rules for
SA. But if you're running SA 3 or later most of the best of these have
been incorporated into the default distribution.

> I'm debating, myself, on whether to try and hook the body-scan-for-URL stuff
> into Postfix... 

There are standalone Postfix tools for SURBLs? Sweeeeeet :-)

I'm using SA to check the SURBLs. I agree it's a pighawg, but I've got a
box with plenty of RAM dedicated to the SA so it works fine. You just
have to put a limit on the number of SA processes that will start up or
else it can turn a dictionary attack into a DOS...  :-(

-Jules