[SLL] Bind or ?
John W. Baxter
jwblist at olympus.net
Fri May 6 12:05:44 PDT 2005
On 5/6/2005 11:14, "Jim Richardson" <warlock at eskimo.com> wrote:
> To be fair, my reservations about Bind are a result of the history, <9
> had some serious problems, but it's a total rewrite now, right? Anyway,
> looks like I'll try Bind and see.
9 is a total rewrite...and while it has had issues they aren't the deluge
that plagued early BIND 4.
And to respond to your other message, I don't find the BIND9 configuration
particularly hard to deal with. (It's easier than BIND4 was.) But I do
keep a recent DNS & BIND (Albitx & Liu) handy.
--John
More information about the linux-list
mailing list